Every dataset tells a unique story in electrical resistivity imaging (ERI). For experienced professionals and academics, the challenge often lies in interpreting this narrative from the inverted data. This involves identifying important subsurface features such as groundwater, voids, contamination plumes, and other significant aspects. 

Exploring the depths below our feet has historically involved disruptive practices that were dangerous, harmed the environment, and were…well, pretty loud. We know the last one may not seem important, but we think it may have everything to do with today's techniques.

We don’t discuss archaeology nearly enough as it deserves. And since it’s October and Halloween is around the corner—why not talk about the spookier side of geoscience? Okay, archaeology isn’t actually scary—unless you’re claustrophobic (the fear of being in tight spaces) or have cartilogenophobia (the fear of bones), or have mummyphobia (which is what we guess the fear of mummies is called).  

We like to dig into various topics on our blog. One method that we want to drill into today is the borehole-to-borehole electrical resistivity survey. 

The beginning stages of any construction project can present various challenges that may affect its success. Addressing these issues early on, from site selection to budget constraints, is crucial. One particular concern is understanding the subsurface geology and potential anomalies that can impact construction. That's where Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI) comes in. This blog post will explore how ERI can be a game-changer in construction projects, ensuring informed decision-making, preventing delays, and mitigating safety hazards.